Preloader image

The @Asynchronous annotation was introduced in EJB 3.1 as a simple way of creating asynchronous processing.

Every time a method annotated @Asynchronous is invoked by anyone it will immediately return regardless of how long the method actually takes. Each invocation returns a Future object that essentially starts out empty and will later have its value filled in by the container when the related method call actually completes. Returning a Future object is not required and @Asynchronous methods can of course return void.

Example

Here, in JobProcessorTest,

final Future<String> red = processor.addJob("red"); proceeds to the next statement,

final Future<String> orange = processor.addJob("orange");

without waiting for the addJob() method to complete. And later we could ask for the result using the Future<?>.get() method like

assertEquals("blue", blue.get());

It waits for the processing to complete (if its not completed already) and gets the result. If you did not care about the result, you could simply have your asynchronous method as a void method.

Future Object from docs,

A Future represents the result of an asynchronous computation. Methods are provided to check if the computation is complete, to wait for its completion, and to retrieve the result of the computation. The result can only be retrieved using method get when the computation has completed, blocking if necessary until it is ready. Cancellation is performed by the cancel method. Additional methods are provided to determine if the task completed normally or was cancelled. Once a computation has completed, the computation cannot be cancelled. If you would like to use a Future for the sake of cancellability but not provide a usable result, you can declare types of the form Future<?> and return null as a result of the underlying task

The code

@Singleton
public class JobProcessor {
@Asynchronous
@Lock(READ)
@AccessTimeout(-1)
public Future<String> addJob(String jobName) {

    // Pretend this job takes a while
    doSomeHeavyLifting();

    // Return our result
    return new AsyncResult<String>(jobName);
}

private void doSomeHeavyLifting() {
    try {
        Thread.sleep(SECONDS.toMillis(10));
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
        Thread.interrupted();
        throw new IllegalStateException(e);
    }
  }
}

Test

public class JobProcessorTest extends TestCase {

public void test() throws Exception {

    final Context context = EJBContainer.createEJBContainer().getContext();

    final JobProcessor processor = (JobProcessor) context.lookup("java:global/async-methods/JobProcessor");

    final long start = System.nanoTime();

    // Queue up a bunch of work
    final Future<String> red = processor.addJob("red");
    final Future<String> orange = processor.addJob("orange");
    final Future<String> yellow = processor.addJob("yellow");
    final Future<String> green = processor.addJob("green");
    final Future<String> blue = processor.addJob("blue");
    final Future<String> violet = processor.addJob("violet");

    // Wait for the result -- 1 minute worth of work
    assertEquals("blue", blue.get());
    assertEquals("orange", orange.get());
    assertEquals("green", green.get());
    assertEquals("red", red.get());
    assertEquals("yellow", yellow.get());
    assertEquals("violet", violet.get());

    // How long did it take?
    final long total = TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toSeconds(System.nanoTime() - start);

    // Execution should be around 9 - 21 seconds
    // The execution time depends on the number of threads available for asynchronous execution.
    // In the best case it is 10s plus some minimal processing time.
    assertTrue("Expected > 9 but was: " + total, total > 9);
    assertTrue("Expected < 21 but was: " + total, total < 21);

  }
}
-------------------------------------------------------
 T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running org.superbiz.async.JobProcessorTest
INFO - ********************************************************************************
INFO - OpenEJB http://tomee.apache.org/
INFO - Startup: Wed Feb 27 12:46:11 BRT 2019
INFO - Copyright 1999-2018 (C) Apache OpenEJB Project, All Rights Reserved.
INFO - Version: 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT
INFO - Build date: 20190227
INFO - Build time: 04:12
INFO - ********************************************************************************
INFO - openejb.home = /home/soro/git/apache/tomee/examples/async-methods
INFO - openejb.base = /home/soro/git/apache/tomee/examples/async-methods
INFO - Created new singletonService org.apache.openejb.cdi.ThreadSingletonServiceImpl@22f71333
INFO - Succeeded in installing singleton service
INFO - Using 'javax.ejb.embeddable.EJBContainer=true'
INFO - Cannot find the configuration file [conf/openejb.xml].  Will attempt to create one for the beans deployed.
INFO - Configuring Service(id=Default Security Service, type=SecurityService, provider-id=Default Security Service)
INFO - Configuring Service(id=Default Transaction Manager, type=TransactionManager, provider-id=Default Transaction Manager)
INFO - Creating TransactionManager(id=Default Transaction Manager)
INFO - Creating SecurityService(id=Default Security Service)
INFO - Found EjbModule in classpath: /home/soro/git/apache/tomee/examples/async-methods/target/classes
INFO - Beginning load: /home/soro/git/apache/tomee/examples/async-methods/target/classes
INFO - Configuring enterprise application: /home/soro/git/apache/tomee/examples/async-methods
INFO - Auto-deploying ejb JobProcessor: EjbDeployment(deployment-id=JobProcessor)
INFO - Configuring Service(id=Default Singleton Container, type=Container, provider-id=Default Singleton Container)
INFO - Auto-creating a container for bean JobProcessor: Container(type=SINGLETON, id=Default Singleton Container)
INFO - Creating Container(id=Default Singleton Container)
INFO - Configuring Service(id=Default Managed Container, type=Container, provider-id=Default Managed Container)
INFO - Auto-creating a container for bean org.superbiz.async.JobProcessorTest: Container(type=MANAGED, id=Default Managed Container)
INFO - Creating Container(id=Default Managed Container)
INFO - Using directory /tmp for stateful session passivation
INFO - Enterprise application "/home/soro/git/apache/tomee/examples/async-methods" loaded.
INFO - Assembling app: /home/soro/git/apache/tomee/examples/async-methods
INFO - Jndi(name="java:global/async-methods/JobProcessor!org.superbiz.async.JobProcessor")
INFO - Jndi(name="java:global/async-methods/JobProcessor")
INFO - Existing thread singleton service in SystemInstance(): org.apache.openejb.cdi.ThreadSingletonServiceImpl@22f71333
INFO - Some Principal APIs could not be loaded: org.eclipse.microprofile.jwt.JsonWebToken out of org.eclipse.microprofile.jwt.JsonWebToken not found
INFO - OpenWebBeans Container is starting...
INFO - Adding OpenWebBeansPlugin : [CdiPlugin]
INFO - All injection points were validated successfully.
INFO - OpenWebBeans Container has started, it took 316 ms.
INFO - Created Ejb(deployment-id=JobProcessor, ejb-name=JobProcessor, container=Default Singleton Container)
INFO - Started Ejb(deployment-id=JobProcessor, ejb-name=JobProcessor, container=Default Singleton Container)
INFO - Deployed Application(path=/home/soro/git/apache/tomee/examples/async-methods)
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 23.491 sec

Results :

Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

How it works under the covers

Under the covers what makes this work is:

  • The JobProcessor the caller sees is not actually an instance of JobProcessor. Rather it’s a subclass or proxy that has all the methods overridden. Methods that are supposed to be asynchronous are handled differently.

  • Calls to an asynchronous method simply result in a Runnable being created that wraps the method and parameters you gave. This runnable is given to an Executor which is simply a work queue attached to a thread pool.

  • After adding the work to the queue, the proxied version of the method returns an implementation of Future that is linked to the Runnable which is now waiting on the queue.

  • When the Runnable finally executes the method on the real JobProcessor instance, it will take the return value and set it into the Future making it available to the caller.

Important to note that the AsyncResult object the JobProcessor returns is not the same Future object the caller is holding. It would have been neat if the real JobProcessor could just return String and the caller’s version of JobProcessor could return Future<String>, but we didn’t see any way to do that without adding more complexity. So the AsyncResult is a simple wrapper object. The container will pull the String out, throw the AsyncResult away, then put the String in the real Future that the caller is holding.

To get progress along the way, simply pass a thread-safe object like AtomicInteger to the @Asynchronous method and have the bean code periodically update it with the percent complete.

For complex asynchronous processing, JavaEE’s answer is @MessageDrivenBean. Have a look at the simple-mdb example